Since things were so lively Wednesday, here’s another spot for you all to poop on. Fire away.
96 Comments
Joel
Lee 3 – I got the bikes aloft rack at the suggestion of someone on the site a few chats ago. Works great. 4 bikes no problem. Also got the short arms for the back and have a spare frame and extra wheels hanging on the back too.
I suggested it, glad you like it, it serves me well too. Its also a good idea to have the rack sit on a flat piece of cloth or paper under it to catch any sand/dirt if you clean your bikes on it.
The Vulgarian
One cannot help but feel some pity for those dumb enough to be drawn into the Tri-guy ruse on Wednesday. Collectively, the number of hours spent reading and writing all that blather borders on criminality, in that it was such a waste of time which might have been spent otherwise. Even whipping the bishop would have a better use daylight.
But enough of that.
In other news, Brittany has been sporting the bearded clam around town this week (sans culottes) a sure sign that its not quite cold enough yet to switch to the heavyweight Under-Armour and booties. Global warming is bad for the planet, I know, but quite good for cycling in NYC.
Question: Why is it that I can effectively and completely execute the snot-rocket nasal-clearing maneuver on one side, but on the other it always seems to wind up on jersey and thigh? Anyone else have this problem?
Soooo….51 shots. Hmmm. Prima facie, this seems a bit excessive. But I wasn’t there, and neither were you. One thought strikes here. Don’t leave a dodgy strip club at 3am, climb in your auto and slam it into an unmarked police van. But how could he know it was unmarked police van you ask? OK fair point, so lets just not slam into anything then. Drunk driving kills, one way or another.
That’s all for now.
V.
HHAte
JP pay up!
schmalz
The Pro tour seems dead…
The representatives of six national cycling federations (Austria, Belgium, Spain, France, Italy and Luxembourg) have met on Thursday, November 30 in Paris and officially declared their opposition to the UCI ProTour "in its current form."
Does anyone care?
Andrew
Where’s Lee3 — no party starts until he weighs in. Contrary to posts on another thread: Lee3, more writing, less thinking please!
DHR
Does anybody care about Luxembourg at all?
pro tour w no astana?
barloworld or unibet get the spot? anyone care?
DHR
Dammit, where is Coach L and Tri Guy when you need them to get things fired up?
TRI GUY
I hate to admit this here, and I know i’m asking for it, but i’m bikerfox’s lovechild. I get all his mankini hand-me-downs.
Anonymous
I like The Vulgarian
That was a good post
TRI GUY
lance became a cyclist because he couldn’t hack it as a triathlete
Lance
I became a cyclist because triathalons bore me.
on to mountain biking!
Anonymous
there is no beard on britney’s clam
Tri Guy
I don’t know why you guys bash triathletes, they get to ride the coolest bikes and wear the coolest outfits. Who wouldn’t want to ride a fully tricked-out Alsop or softride with aero bars and all the fixin’s.
Also, all the best cycling-related innovations have come out from tri’s – who do you think came up with the bar-mounted waterbottle with the straw that goes up to your mouth, camelpacks, bottle cages on your seat, bento-boxes, sleeveless jerseys, the list goes on and on.
Tell us we have lemons in our pussies if you want but chicks are way more impressed with us than you silly road racers. Who cares about what’s harder, it’s what sounds harder that counts!!!
Chris M
Jesus, I just don’t care enough about those goofy looking and inept riding triathletes to bother engaging in a shallow argument, esp when I suspect Im just arguing with a foil. As far as Im concerned, they can go ahead and obsess around the park all day as long as they dont draft me. I feel like they exist in part to make me feel better about wearing all that lycra, and to give a bunch of bike geeks something to make fun of – hey, tri’s are even geekier!
On a more positive note, yesterday was just awesome. Rode in CP for 2 hours and savored the warm air circulating around my now hairy winter legs. Like a gift from God to NYC cyclists! Surprisingly few familiar faces out late afternoon, but good to see a couple anyway… I wish the whole winter could be like this, and we could re-name NYC "Los Neuvo York" or something. Scary how fast the peleton would be come March…
cw
hey, tri guy, i bet even the tri chicks care about what’s harder when they are in bed rather than what sounds harder…
Chris M
On another note, I read the article on the Apple power meter software thingy, and I have concluded that I think Im even less likely than ever to buy a power tap. I intend to train seriously, but honestly just can’t see spending another 30 min a day AFTER training to download a bunch of data to tell me what I basically already know from the feeling in my legs during and after the ride, and from the intervals done etc.
I guess Id use one if someone gave me one, but to spend money and time when I know the HRM gets me most of the benefit just seems a bit much… I feel like I can train through HR/perceived effort just about as effectively. Do we really need to SEE every effort graphed out afterwards. Im all for periodic power testing, but every workout? Hmmm. Im not against it, per se, but just am not a convert here….
I also feel like staring at the power meter during rides takes much of the fun out of the workout – maybe a step too far towards the efficiency of effort and leads us away from the enjoyment aspect, which is a key part of the sport right?
Mr. Old School
lee3
Thoughtless comment 1 –
The UCI’s days are #’rd – I predict next season the Grand Tours tell the Pro-tour to go stuff it!! How can cycling weather another season without the big players? No Vino in the mix!? C’mon he won the Vuelta and the other shoe hasnt dropped without scandel. The Continental/Pro – Pro tour barriers are friggen stupid and should be done away with or fixed.
Nice work Joel – I may follow your lead on the bike storage thing. I’m too busy these days to get any side stuff done.
Anonymous
That tri guy post is not the original TRI GUY. Can you people please make up your own names instead of stealing other peoples. That is such a retarded thing to do.
I shouldn’t have to even write that but there are always some dumbasses out there that do stupid things.
adm
I wanted to remind everyone that Schmaltz drafted Sarah when he won the Ladies Sprint Cup two weeks ago. I’d like to see another rematch . . . best of 5.
Thanks for coming back Lee3. You complete us.
HHAte
Hey Chris M. Draft hogs suck! At least tri guys; as much as I dislike them; let a brother share a draft. Granted its ususlly slower then I want to go but stil its nice.
Tri-nation
Tri guy is not anyone person but a way of life. A colorful life of dorky bikes, bravado and three-sported mediocrity.
schmalz
adm – don’t hate the player…
TRI GUY
which tri guy wasn’t the original tri guy?
more importantly, if a triathlete falls off his bike going into the transition area… …does anyone care?
adm
I don’t hate anyone, especially you. But we need something to be excited about in the off-season. What if we bring beer to the rematch?
TRI GUY
I DEMAND TO KNOW WHO THIS IMPOSTER IS.
I would stick around to argue about how tri’s are better than cycling, but I have to get to my waxing appointment to get my Mangina taken care of. cause there’e nothing less aero than a tri-geek’s pubes popping out of his mankini.
Anonymous
JP is that you hiding behind the triguy…come on out and pay JT
lee3
ADM is there gonna be any Bandit wine bar offerings @ Spillage? I wont be hittin any beer. Do they make a Merlot?
TRI GUY
I DEMAND TO KNOW WHO THIS IMPOSTER IS.
I would stick around to argue about how tri’s are better than cycling, but I have to get to my waxing appointment to get my Mangina taken care of. cause there’e nothing less aero than a tri-geek’s pubes popping out of his mankini.
Anonymous
lee, are you afraid you’ll spill beer on your mankini?
about tri?
wait a minute, i’m confused. I know what being bi means, but I dont know what being tri means? I’m getting a little scared of the tri-life people.
Tri-nation talks of a colorful life, not sure i’m down with that.
Lets be south park when they banned the canadians, ban the tri guy or guys or what ever kind of sick things they’re trying to influence us with!
Tri-talian
My wheels are like-a a pizzapie, my bars are like-a bucatini, my bento box-a are full-a cannoli for energy.
Anonymous
i hear tri guy likes to get "more aero" by tucking….
…his wee wee between his legs. it really makes the mankini shine
Chris M,
those are all very legitimate points (re: the need for power training). . .
I decided to get into power after spending a few days here reading about it. I had been out of the sport for a long, long time and was trying to decide how best to "catch up." So my situation was a special case.
But after deciphering all the arcane and unfathomable terms, I came to a very simple conclusion: with so many good riders out there sharing their numbers, it’s a no-brainer. They were literally giving me all the information I needed to determine if I could still keep up . . for free! It seemed like a revelation to me at the time. I already knew from past experience that in this sport you can easily waste a whole year on trial and error alone, so the cost of the PowerTap seemed small in that light.
But you’re right: the endless fiddling around with the gadgetry often seems like its own flavor of time-consuming foolishness. You’re still going to come crashing up against the limits of your age and natural abilities anyway (which for most are going to be about 75-100 watts below what the best local riders can sustain).
But those numbers are cool: whether you can crack ’em or no, they do represent a goal. I respect riders for sharing those numbers. It’s like the gauntlet has been thrown down, now see if you’re up to it kind of thing. It also expands the intellectual interest greatly in terms of discovering just what the physiological possibilities are, so there’s a kind of hobbiest appeal in that sense.
Well, better sign off before I kill another fun thread. . .
G.G.
schmalz. . .
I went to cyclingnews and read that story twice and still don’t get it: maybe it’s all the acronyms. For example, what is the "audit, which probably aims at damaging the prestige of the great cycling monuments." Seems like typical bureaucratic bickering. But I sure do care: the sport needs a pro tour to glue it together. G.G.
I know that IââŹâ˘m like packfill now who always shouts at the guys at the front to counter break attempts but please guys, if we carry on this way I would need to start working and I would like to avoid that on a Friday. Pretty much like on Wednesdays. Anyone?? Haters??
schmalz
The whole pro tour thing was a pissing match. For the thing to work, someone needed to give up some power. The grand tours didn’t need to because they make their own TV deals, and the UCI really does nothing for them, monetarily.
So the UCI just tried to shoe horn a new organization on the races and the federations, and they all told the UCI to bite it because they really don’t need the UCI.
That's right, Andy, fess up. . .
you’ve got one, don’t you? (oh, that’s right you can’t hear in that plastic tent, can you?) Look for this on Hate, Vol. 23
g.g.
Hater
Hey CP, if you don’t like the threads here, GET YOUR OWN SITE.
At least you learned how to spell.
The UCI
and all those other acronyms always make my eyes glaze over, kind of like Jim Friel’s training bible. . . but I do think a pro tour is a useful way to expand the fan base beyond the usual handful of pot-bellied Belgians standing on the roadside at the spring classics. . .
CP
Gaan naai jouself. That was in my home language and I can assure you that it is spelt just fine.
Hater
Andy, could you do something about all the damn foreigners on this site?
The foreigners and triathletes need to get their own site.
CP
Hater, may I remind you that you are also a foreigner or are you maybe one of the thousands of native American cyclists we always see in the Central Park races? I am just a more recent settler (ship was seriously delayed).
HHAte
Who is bigpoppa52?
schmalz
The pro tour was a good theory, but the implementation was awful. RIP Pro tour.
adm
Lee3 – – I’m pretty sure there will be some Bandit goodies at the Spillage. I’ll make sure we have a Merlot for you, but if you wear the mankini I won’t let you have it. I’m going to punch you in the nuts instead.
Chris M
GG, thanks for the thoughtful response. I think you really hit on it – its not so much that power meters necessarily make you go faster, but its a fun hobbyists approach to counting the beans, and I guess we spend so much time at it why not spend some more! Problem is, it would eat into my frivolous NYVC reading/posting time…
Andy (from inside my hypoxic tent)
Chris, for me, the advantage of the power meter is that it improves the quality of your workouts. Pre PM my intervals would start out at 400+ watts and peter out to 150. I’d think I was doing good work since it hurt a lot. With a PM you can hold the correct wattage for the duration of your interval.
To CP
Native American Cyclists? What in the hell is that?
Are you a redneck CP?
Ben H
Powermeters give you one more gauge to watch when you train and race. One very useful thing about a training w/ a powermeter is being able to look at intervals from effort to effort and see how your power compares and where it starts to drop off. Its great for doing hill repeats you can see exactly when your power starts to drop off and you know when to stop. Doing them based on PE doesn’t give you a very accurate read of this. I have tested it and found that some days I will feel terrible and my power is still there and I have several more intervals in me. Other days I will feel great, but my power will be falling off.
You certainly don’t need a powermeter to train, but that doesn’t make them a useless tool.
Oh, and triathletes suck.
lee3
I will @ some point invest in the pwr-meter. I just have to piggyback the purchase with a new crankset. I’m not a big fan of the pwr-tap cause your locked into the wheel that has the hub. I’m sold on being able to look @ what’s going on in the engine with precision during the racing application. For training I think the hrt-rate is good enough with pwr checks every now and then.
Anyone showing up Mankini’d out @ spillage deserves the swift punch to the jewel box without question! – and to my last post (I kiiiiidd I kiiiiiid đ
Neu
ADM wrote:
Thanks for coming back Lee3. You complete us.
Now that’s funny! (Not sure why)
protour
The first go around was marred in controversy with the integration of the leader jersey along with World champ status. It was doomed when Oscar didnt want to wear it over the Rainbow. Danilo was on fire when he wore it.
sassy
Ray sucks.
sassy
Ray sucks.
sassy
Ray sucks.
now for something useful
what’s the real deal with "racing" and "training" tires…because my maxxis training tires weigh around the same (220g) as many race tires and never go flat. But any "race" tire i’ve ever had is a real hazard to go flat any time. I did notice a slightly nicer ride quality. Objectively are they any faster?
Naa Oyo
Just wanted to say a swell time was had by all at Spin last night. Thanks again to Alex for posting our flyer and thanks to all who came out. The next one will probably be in January, perhaps in Brooklyn…
Chris M
Re: Power taps I cant argue with any of those points. I would perhaps add though that over time it may not make one faster to know the exact power output on hill repeats, since a good workout should leave the rider feeling about the same whether using a HR or Power tap, right? So we should basically do whatever it takes to hit a an even level of exhaustion. Still would be nice to know the power decline I guess – cant argue with that at all.
Re racing tires, I have found it interesting that some of them only recommend filling to 120 psi, vs waaaay higher up to 150 psi for others and even higher for tubulars (200++). I think this is the key performance diff, as the higher psi tires are clearly going to roll easier than a less hard tire surface. Weight is harder to argue, though many training tires are clearly heavier, and hence harder to puncture. If a tire is only 220 gr, then Id suggest its likely a race/training hybrid, which gives you the advantages of both, and neither! Id prob go with a light and high psi race tire, and train with a real clunker to save flat changes. The hybrid is more for those with less inclination to specialize and make changes for races, or those with only one wheel set that dont want to mess around with changes.
So there’s my totally amateur answer…how about the opinion of a real expert?
Giro
"The 2007 Giro d’Italia will kick off May 12 with a team time trial on the island of Caprera, ascend the feared Monte Zoncolan – a 10.1km ascent with an average gradient of 17 percent – and finish in Milan on June 3, organizers announced Saturday in Milan."
Over 6 miles at 17 percent. Wow.
Happy Feet = toe warmers in shoes + booties
Happy Feet = toe warmers in shoes + booties
DATA
"150 psi for others and even higher for tubulars (200++). I think this is the key performance diff, as the higher psi tires are clearly going to roll easier than a less hard tire surface."
pretty heavy roster of u23s. we better hope the kiddies dont have any down weekends in between NRC races or the club races are gonna be harder to say the least. nice work, baz.(skntcycling.com)
Anonymous
happy, nice comments have no place on this website.
New NYVelocity Poll
Triathletes:
-triple the athlete
-mediocre geeks on ostentateous bikes
-mankini
Coach MNOP
Power Meters:
post says " a good workout should leave the rider feeling about the same whether using a HR or Power tap, right? "
Well not really, that’s the difference between physical stress and mental stress.
Your heart rate can be elevated but your power reduced due to all sorts of factors. So that poses the question of is your training well targeted becuase your HR is in the right zone even though your power is lacking? If the winner of the race was the guy who had the highest or lowest HR at the end of the race this sort of training would be great, but this is a sport dicated by power ( not entirely but to a large extent ) so the guy who can hold the highest power for the longest time will usually win.
Training soley with HR you are subject to different factors which can be misleading, such as half life, cardiac drift, dehaydration, heat etc. but with power watts are watts. Having said all that a good coach can calculate all this in to a HR based training program.
Do you need a power meter to train? absolutley not. Is it a useful training metric? totally. Can it make your training more focussed and help you identify your weaknesses and work on them more efficiently? without doubt. Will it make you a better racer? sorry, there are no silver bullets.
From a purely analytical stand point training with power & heart rate is better than just training with HR, however if you don’t knonw how to use the numbers and convert those in to a training program that brings results a power meter is just a really expensive bike computer.
Tires:
Rolling resistance is not entirely defined by tire pressure. Max pressure for a lot of clincher manufactures is defined by the fact that they are clinchers and as wheel manufactures make lighter and lighter wheels the possibility of tire pressure collapsing the rim wall if quite high so that’s part of the equation.
Another part of the equation is the shape of the tire and how well it holds that shape, under difference directional forces. Tubs are made to be very round and do not deform as much under direction forces ( cornering, sprinting etc. ) Because of the way a clincher must grip the rim with it’s bead the shape cannot be as uniform as a tub and a lot of this is what dicates the ride quality.
The weight differnce is really not an issue. I’d rather have a tire that didn’t puncture and got me to the end of a race, than a light tire that helped bring my bike under the UCI weight limit.
lee3
good post.
Chris M
OK, so all interesting and legit posts, but how do we define "better" for a tire then? Ive used 150 psi race tires to great effect, and recently have tried another manufacturer and noticed only after buying that they recommend only 120 psi. I bought it so decided to use it anyway… Assuming both will stay on the rim (neither has collapsed or anything…), and forgetting ride quality (we’re talking speed here…), is the higher psi tire better or not? Im tempted to think so, but since the 120 psi tire is from a big intnl maker that could certainly afford to design a higher psi product, I must be missing something key here. The harder tire does feel harder, and I assume must be giving better rolling resistence performance, no? What gives???
Also, do the pros all use tubulars still, or do they sometimes use clinchers? I sort of assume they use tubulars for the lower weight, higher psi and smoother ride – esp since they get a hired hand to mount and change them!
jonathanx
I’m curious about handling as well. A thin, light clincher at 150lbs doesn’t exactly inspire my confidence on high-speed descents, and entering turns really hot as in a crit. I have very little experience on tubulars. Is there a marked advantage in these situations?
Anonymous
quality tubulars have a much nicer feel when riding than clinchers. they are considered superior racing tires for a number of reasons but as for pure speed, they allow you to run greater pressure w/o sacrificing handling. Taking a high speed corner on a nice tubular at 140 psi is fairly safe and you feel more contact/grip with the road. taking the same corner on continental gp 4000 clincher at 140psi is a nice way to end up in the bushes
all anecdotal:
….don’t ride tubulars, don’t use a power meter.
trouble with sarcasm
I mean, don’t ride clinchers, don’t use a power meter.
Coach MNOP
Tires Part Deux
Tire pressure does have a lot to do with rolling resistance. But tires are design with an optimum pressure range ( depends on how much weight you’re putting on them and your riding style ) The pressure range dictates the shape of the tire which is one of the most important elements. A tire that retains it shape and keep maximum contact with the road surafce at all times will give good holding in corners and traction when you put the power down in both wet and dry conditions. So higher pressure is not always better as it could reduce the tire surface contact with the road therefore reducing your power transfer. Think about drag racing, massive horsepower, big fat low pressure tires, but they go really fast, really quickly.
Rubber compound will have some effect on the rolling resistance as well. An example is some tires made for the track use a softer compound to grip the boards better, the design is looking for a balance between traction & rolling resistance. The surface the tire is running on is quite smooth. Use that same tire on the road and you’ll find it’s handling completely different. I hope that answers your question?
Do all pro’s still use tubs? I know a few teams have been riding on clinchers but the majority of ProTour teams would still be on tubs. I know a couple of guys who ride pro and they are all on tubs. Hell if someone else is paying for them, gluing them and I have neutral service or a team car with spare wheels, I’m going with tubs everytime.
Chris M
Solid additional points. Its true I’ve had issues at times with wheel skip when sprinting, and this is more pronounced on the high psi tires (though compounded by my body position too far forward). Not sure about the tradeoff though between the long dist on that tire vs the issue in the sprint – Id rather be confident that Im not hampered for the other 99% of the race by too much rolling resistence. Still, I see your point about the tradeoff of power transfer at least for the moments of high torque. Thanks for the elaboration…
Jay
As for the tire discussion, what we’re missing here is the makeup of the casing. A higher TPI (threads per inch) casing will be more supple and will ride more comfortably/maintain better road contact at higher pressure. Cheaper tires with stiffer casings will ride uncomfortably at higher pressure and lose contact with the road, creating greater rolling resistance. Tubulars tend to be quite supple which is why they have the rep for being so comfortable, handling so well, and can still have low rolling resistance at high pressure.
I’ve been using Vittoria’s and Veloflex’s, both high TPI casing clinchers, and love their comfort and road grip/handling.
Lastly, light weight clincher wheels tend to have psi limits. My American Classics have a 120 psi limit and my HEDS have a 130 psi limit.
Jay
adm
The tire discussion is interesting, but at our level races are won on fitness, brains or guile. Tires don’t matter.
adm
And tires probably don’t dictate results at higher levels, but I wouldn’t know.
MH
I agree with adm. Rolling resistance is hardly worth worrying about. The most important issue with race tires is how well they grip in corners. If you’re putting 150 psi in your tires at a crit (no matter what the claimed max psi is), you’re not making yourself any faster. All you’re doing is increasing your odds of crashing and taking others down with you.
jonathan
so basically, if you are a local racer not a pro, and you ride clinchers like 95% of us, you’re better off riding something which will give you adequate grip and no flats…right?
adm
To jonathon – – generally yes. I’ve flatted out off a lot of races that i might have done well in. "Might" being the operative word. It’s very hard to catch back on if you flat. Last year I only saw two guys do it. Badger did it at Palmer in the 35+ (on the last lap) and ended up with a top 10, and some guy (whose name I forget) did it at Bear Mtn (Fall) in the Cat 3 field and ended up with a top 5. Both of those guys were very strong and the race played to their favor. But it’s generally very hard to do it. When you flat at our level, it’s usually time to go home. So much of cycling is based on luck, you may as well put the odds in your favor a bit by riding a tire that is flat-resistant.
Lurker
adm don’t be so quick to dismiss an interesting thread at least talking about tires is somewhat contructive and informative for the readers. Unlike most of the stuff I’ve seen posted on this site about ‘my dick being bigger than your dick’
I guess sensible discussion is not good for your page view count when trying to attract advertisers?
Tangential
Tire selection in mountain bike racing is highly strategic and can make a huge difference. Pressure, sticky v firm compound, knob height, tread pattern, and tire width. Add to that tube v tubeless. Off road, tubeless tires allow for much lower pressure and better traction without pinch flatting. I’ve read about tubeless road tires. Where is that technology now, and is there any advantage?
The Real Tri-Guy
If you want to read about all the hardest of the hard core, from tire pressure to to knowing what a clincher rim looks like compaired to a tubular check out THIS:
…Only then will you be able to know how to place in your AG, set a PR, bring home the hardware and get what you need from the LBS. Real Experts discussing the harsh realities of the Tri World.
I’ve caught back up after flats – never in a park race though. In road races with good neutral support.
adm
Lurker – – Like I said, it’s an interesting discussion. My dismissiveness has nothing to do with the length of the discussion on this page. This is a subject people have discussed among themselves for ages. I personally think it’s hard to win a race if you’ve flatted on your ultra-light, ultra-fast, over-inflated tire.
To "someone you may know" – – didn’t mean to offend. I’m sure there are plenty of other guys (yourself included) who’ve caught back on, but I’ve been particularly unsuccessful at it. Good wheel support is key, as is being either (1) really fast (which I’m not) or (2) fortunate enough to flat at a slower or flatter part of the race (which I haven’t been). I now just try to avoid flats (nothing novel there) at the risk of being on a marginally slower tire.
tri guy rules
Wow that was hardcore. I learned that I have inflate my tire!
I also learned what my clincher rim look like compared to a tubular.
To much for me, way to hardcore! This site sucks, only listen to tri guy.
Tri guy, tell me more!
schmalz
Only time I’ve ever heard a pro blast a sponsor in an interview was when Van Petegem said that when he was on Mercury the bikes were awful and the tires they rode at Roubiax slipped all over the place and prevented them from being competitive. Feel free to investigate for yourself which bikes and tires he was talking about.
TRI GUY (TM)
Stop pretending to be me – ‘Real’ Tri Guy etc…. Are you guys so lame you can’t even come up with your own identities? But maybe it’s too hard for you to THINK FOR YOURSELF after riding around in your little pack all day….
The realist, real Tri-Guy
Listen up "Tri-Guy", I was there from the first mankini to the TT bikes at interbike. My Cervelo P3 is gold plated and worth over $30K, and I can average almost 19mph for at least 1hr. I set a PR last year at Mooseman. I also gave you pathetic cyclists the link to slowtwitch.com. Need I prove myself more????
-TG
ps: Look out 2007, I’ll be spending all winter doing one legged intervals on my computrainer. I’ll be over 19mph for sure.
Coach Q,Re,S,T
Tri bikes on a Sunday in CP at 30 m.p.h. on the downhill at 72nd with shoppers and tourists and idiots wandering around are NOT smart entities.
Saw one nearly smash a poor overloaded shopper. Nasty.
Tri Guy
Tri-Guy’s gotta train HARD!!! No time or space for tourists. My aerobars cut through tourists like a hot knife through butter…wait, 30mph??
That wasn’t a tri-guy, everyone knows we only go 19mph, max.
-TG
Comments are closed.
Recent Comments
Matty McNatty { Imagine if circa 2010 Netflix could have done one of these docudramas on the CRCA scene in those days? Greg Olsen, Colin Prensky, and that... }
{ Great Stuff Dan!!! }
pommespommes { Glad your back to blogging. I wish there was more race reporting/news in the NYC area (other than f*cebook) from both 1st and 3rd person.... }
{ You âgiftedâ the field the first race of the year. Eddy isnât pleased. }
Benzina { Schmalz is back. Life is better, somehow. }
schmalz { There's no dignity in amateur bike racing }
Lee 3 – I got the bikes aloft rack at the suggestion of someone on the site a few chats ago. Works great. 4 bikes no problem. Also got the short arms for the back and have a spare frame and extra wheels hanging on the back too.
http://performancebike.resultspage.com/search?p=Q&ts=custom&w=bikes+aloft
triathletes are SO aero!
I suggested it, glad you like it, it serves me well too. Its also a good idea to have the rack sit on a flat piece of cloth or paper under it to catch any sand/dirt if you clean your bikes on it.
One cannot help but feel some pity for those dumb enough to be drawn into the Tri-guy ruse on Wednesday. Collectively, the number of hours spent reading and writing all that blather borders on criminality, in that it was such a waste of time which might have been spent otherwise. Even whipping the bishop would have a better use daylight.
But enough of that.
In other news, Brittany has been sporting the bearded clam around town this week (sans culottes) a sure sign that its not quite cold enough yet to switch to the heavyweight Under-Armour and booties. Global warming is bad for the planet, I know, but quite good for cycling in NYC.
Question: Why is it that I can effectively and completely execute the snot-rocket nasal-clearing maneuver on one side, but on the other it always seems to wind up on jersey and thigh? Anyone else have this problem?
Soooo….51 shots. Hmmm. Prima facie, this seems a bit excessive. But I wasn’t there, and neither were you. One thought strikes here. Don’t leave a dodgy strip club at 3am, climb in your auto and slam it into an unmarked police van. But how could he know it was unmarked police van you ask? OK fair point, so lets just not slam into anything then. Drunk driving kills, one way or another.
That’s all for now.
V.
JP pay up!
The Pro tour seems dead…
The representatives of six national cycling federations (Austria, Belgium, Spain, France, Italy and Luxembourg) have met on Thursday, November 30 in Paris and officially declared their opposition to the UCI ProTour "in its current form."
Does anyone care?
Where’s Lee3 — no party starts until he weighs in. Contrary to posts on another thread: Lee3, more writing, less thinking please!
Does anybody care about Luxembourg at all?
barloworld or unibet get the spot? anyone care?
Dammit, where is Coach L and Tri Guy when you need them to get things fired up?
I hate to admit this here, and I know i’m asking for it, but i’m bikerfox’s lovechild. I get all his mankini hand-me-downs.
I like The Vulgarian
That was a good post
lance became a cyclist because he couldn’t hack it as a triathlete
I became a cyclist because triathalons bore me.
on to mountain biking!
there is no beard on britney’s clam
I don’t know why you guys bash triathletes, they get to ride the coolest bikes and wear the coolest outfits. Who wouldn’t want to ride a fully tricked-out Alsop or softride with aero bars and all the fixin’s.
Also, all the best cycling-related innovations have come out from tri’s – who do you think came up with the bar-mounted waterbottle with the straw that goes up to your mouth, camelpacks, bottle cages on your seat, bento-boxes, sleeveless jerseys, the list goes on and on.
Tell us we have lemons in our pussies if you want but chicks are way more impressed with us than you silly road racers. Who cares about what’s harder, it’s what sounds harder that counts!!!
Jesus, I just don’t care enough about those goofy looking and inept riding triathletes to bother engaging in a shallow argument, esp when I suspect Im just arguing with a foil. As far as Im concerned, they can go ahead and obsess around the park all day as long as they dont draft me. I feel like they exist in part to make me feel better about wearing all that lycra, and to give a bunch of bike geeks something to make fun of – hey, tri’s are even geekier!
On a more positive note, yesterday was just awesome. Rode in CP for 2 hours and savored the warm air circulating around my now hairy winter legs. Like a gift from God to NYC cyclists! Surprisingly few familiar faces out late afternoon, but good to see a couple anyway… I wish the whole winter could be like this, and we could re-name NYC "Los Neuvo York" or something. Scary how fast the peleton would be come March…
hey, tri guy, i bet even the tri chicks care about what’s harder when they are in bed rather than what sounds harder…
On another note, I read the article on the Apple power meter software thingy, and I have concluded that I think Im even less likely than ever to buy a power tap. I intend to train seriously, but honestly just can’t see spending another 30 min a day AFTER training to download a bunch of data to tell me what I basically already know from the feeling in my legs during and after the ride, and from the intervals done etc.
I guess Id use one if someone gave me one, but to spend money and time when I know the HRM gets me most of the benefit just seems a bit much… I feel like I can train through HR/perceived effort just about as effectively. Do we really need to SEE every effort graphed out afterwards. Im all for periodic power testing, but every workout? Hmmm. Im not against it, per se, but just am not a convert here….
I also feel like staring at the power meter during rides takes much of the fun out of the workout – maybe a step too far towards the efficiency of effort and leads us away from the enjoyment aspect, which is a key part of the sport right?
Mr. Old School
Thoughtless comment 1 –
The UCI’s days are #’rd – I predict next season the Grand Tours tell the Pro-tour to go stuff it!! How can cycling weather another season without the big players? No Vino in the mix!? C’mon he won the Vuelta and the other shoe hasnt dropped without scandel. The Continental/Pro – Pro tour barriers are friggen stupid and should be done away with or fixed.
Nice work Joel – I may follow your lead on the bike storage thing. I’m too busy these days to get any side stuff done.
That tri guy post is not the original TRI GUY. Can you people please make up your own names instead of stealing other peoples. That is such a retarded thing to do.
I shouldn’t have to even write that but there are always some dumbasses out there that do stupid things.
I wanted to remind everyone that Schmaltz drafted Sarah when he won the Ladies Sprint Cup two weeks ago. I’d like to see another rematch . . . best of 5.
Thanks for coming back Lee3. You complete us.
Hey Chris M. Draft hogs suck! At least tri guys; as much as I dislike them; let a brother share a draft. Granted its ususlly slower then I want to go but stil its nice.
Tri guy is not anyone person but a way of life. A colorful life of dorky bikes, bravado and three-sported mediocrity.
adm – don’t hate the player…
which tri guy wasn’t the original tri guy?
more importantly, if a triathlete falls off his bike going into the transition area… …does anyone care?
I don’t hate anyone, especially you. But we need something to be excited about in the off-season. What if we bring beer to the rematch?
I DEMAND TO KNOW WHO THIS IMPOSTER IS.
I would stick around to argue about how tri’s are better than cycling, but I have to get to my waxing appointment to get my Mangina taken care of. cause there’e nothing less aero than a tri-geek’s pubes popping out of his mankini.
JP is that you hiding behind the triguy…come on out and pay JT
ADM is there gonna be any Bandit wine bar offerings @ Spillage? I wont be hittin any beer. Do they make a Merlot?
I DEMAND TO KNOW WHO THIS IMPOSTER IS.
I would stick around to argue about how tri’s are better than cycling, but I have to get to my waxing appointment to get my Mangina taken care of. cause there’e nothing less aero than a tri-geek’s pubes popping out of his mankini.
lee, are you afraid you’ll spill beer on your mankini?
wait a minute, i’m confused. I know what being bi means, but I dont know what being tri means? I’m getting a little scared of the tri-life people.
Tri-nation talks of a colorful life, not sure i’m down with that.
Lets be south park when they banned the canadians, ban the tri guy or guys or what ever kind of sick things they’re trying to influence us with!
My wheels are like-a a pizzapie, my bars are like-a bucatini, my bento box-a are full-a cannoli for energy.
i hear tri guy likes to get "more aero" by tucking….
…his wee wee between his legs. it really makes the mankini shine
those are all very legitimate points (re: the need for power training). . .
I decided to get into power after spending a few days here reading about it. I had been out of the sport for a long, long time and was trying to decide how best to "catch up." So my situation was a special case.
But after deciphering all the arcane and unfathomable terms, I came to a very simple conclusion: with so many good riders out there sharing their numbers, it’s a no-brainer. They were literally giving me all the information I needed to determine if I could still keep up . . for free! It seemed like a revelation to me at the time. I already knew from past experience that in this sport you can easily waste a whole year on trial and error alone, so the cost of the PowerTap seemed small in that light.
But you’re right: the endless fiddling around with the gadgetry often seems like its own flavor of time-consuming foolishness. You’re still going to come crashing up against the limits of your age and natural abilities anyway (which for most are going to be about 75-100 watts below what the best local riders can sustain).
But those numbers are cool: whether you can crack ’em or no, they do represent a goal. I respect riders for sharing those numbers. It’s like the gauntlet has been thrown down, now see if you’re up to it kind of thing. It also expands the intellectual interest greatly in terms of discovering just what the physiological possibilities are, so there’s a kind of hobbiest appeal in that sense.
Well, better sign off before I kill another fun thread. . .
G.G.
I went to cyclingnews and read that story twice and still don’t get it: maybe it’s all the acronyms. For example, what is the "audit, which probably aims at damaging the prestige of the great cycling monuments." Seems like typical bureaucratic bickering. But I sure do care: the sport needs a pro tour to glue it together. G.G.
hey….nobody likes a beer smellin noony!!
I just want to know who bought this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/CAT-150-Portable-Colorado-Altitude-Training-Tent_W0QQitemZ170054391759QQihZ007QQcategoryZ2904QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I know that IââŹâ˘m like packfill now who always shouts at the guys at the front to counter break attempts but please guys, if we carry on this way I would need to start working and I would like to avoid that on a Friday. Pretty much like on Wednesdays. Anyone?? Haters??
The whole pro tour thing was a pissing match. For the thing to work, someone needed to give up some power. The grand tours didn’t need to because they make their own TV deals, and the UCI really does nothing for them, monetarily.
So the UCI just tried to shoe horn a new organization on the races and the federations, and they all told the UCI to bite it because they really don’t need the UCI.
you’ve got one, don’t you? (oh, that’s right you can’t hear in that plastic tent, can you?) Look for this on Hate, Vol. 23
g.g.
Hey CP, if you don’t like the threads here, GET YOUR OWN SITE.
At least you learned how to spell.
and all those other acronyms always make my eyes glaze over, kind of like Jim Friel’s training bible. . . but I do think a pro tour is a useful way to expand the fan base beyond the usual handful of pot-bellied Belgians standing on the roadside at the spring classics. . .
Gaan naai jouself. That was in my home language and I can assure you that it is spelt just fine.
Andy, could you do something about all the damn foreigners on this site?
The foreigners and triathletes need to get their own site.
Hater, may I remind you that you are also a foreigner or are you maybe one of the thousands of native American cyclists we always see in the Central Park races? I am just a more recent settler (ship was seriously delayed).
Who is bigpoppa52?
The pro tour was a good theory, but the implementation was awful. RIP Pro tour.
Lee3 – – I’m pretty sure there will be some Bandit goodies at the Spillage. I’ll make sure we have a Merlot for you, but if you wear the mankini I won’t let you have it. I’m going to punch you in the nuts instead.
GG, thanks for the thoughtful response. I think you really hit on it – its not so much that power meters necessarily make you go faster, but its a fun hobbyists approach to counting the beans, and I guess we spend so much time at it why not spend some more! Problem is, it would eat into my frivolous NYVC reading/posting time…
Chris, for me, the advantage of the power meter is that it improves the quality of your workouts. Pre PM my intervals would start out at 400+ watts and peter out to 150. I’d think I was doing good work since it hurt a lot. With a PM you can hold the correct wattage for the duration of your interval.
Native American Cyclists? What in the hell is that?
Are you a redneck CP?
Powermeters give you one more gauge to watch when you train and race. One very useful thing about a training w/ a powermeter is being able to look at intervals from effort to effort and see how your power compares and where it starts to drop off. Its great for doing hill repeats you can see exactly when your power starts to drop off and you know when to stop. Doing them based on PE doesn’t give you a very accurate read of this. I have tested it and found that some days I will feel terrible and my power is still there and I have several more intervals in me. Other days I will feel great, but my power will be falling off.
You certainly don’t need a powermeter to train, but that doesn’t make them a useless tool.
Oh, and triathletes suck.
I will @ some point invest in the pwr-meter. I just have to piggyback the purchase with a new crankset. I’m not a big fan of the pwr-tap cause your locked into the wheel that has the hub. I’m sold on being able to look @ what’s going on in the engine with precision during the racing application. For training I think the hrt-rate is good enough with pwr checks every now and then.
Anyone showing up Mankini’d out @ spillage deserves the swift punch to the jewel box without question! – and to my last post (I kiiiiidd I kiiiiiid đ
ADM wrote:
Thanks for coming back Lee3. You complete us.
Now that’s funny! (Not sure why)
The first go around was marred in controversy with the integration of the leader jersey along with World champ status. It was doomed when Oscar didnt want to wear it over the Rainbow. Danilo was on fire when he wore it.
Ray sucks.
Ray sucks.
Ray sucks.
what’s the real deal with "racing" and "training" tires…because my maxxis training tires weigh around the same (220g) as many race tires and never go flat. But any "race" tire i’ve ever had is a real hazard to go flat any time. I did notice a slightly nicer ride quality. Objectively are they any faster?
Just wanted to say a swell time was had by all at Spin last night. Thanks again to Alex for posting our flyer and thanks to all who came out. The next one will probably be in January, perhaps in Brooklyn…
Re: Power taps I cant argue with any of those points. I would perhaps add though that over time it may not make one faster to know the exact power output on hill repeats, since a good workout should leave the rider feeling about the same whether using a HR or Power tap, right? So we should basically do whatever it takes to hit a an even level of exhaustion. Still would be nice to know the power decline I guess – cant argue with that at all.
Re racing tires, I have found it interesting that some of them only recommend filling to 120 psi, vs waaaay higher up to 150 psi for others and even higher for tubulars (200++). I think this is the key performance diff, as the higher psi tires are clearly going to roll easier than a less hard tire surface. Weight is harder to argue, though many training tires are clearly heavier, and hence harder to puncture. If a tire is only 220 gr, then Id suggest its likely a race/training hybrid, which gives you the advantages of both, and neither! Id prob go with a light and high psi race tire, and train with a real clunker to save flat changes. The hybrid is more for those with less inclination to specialize and make changes for races, or those with only one wheel set that dont want to mess around with changes.
So there’s my totally amateur answer…how about the opinion of a real expert?
"The 2007 Giro d’Italia will kick off May 12 with a team time trial on the island of Caprera, ascend the feared Monte Zoncolan – a 10.1km ascent with an average gradient of 17 percent – and finish in Milan on June 3, organizers announced Saturday in Milan."
Over 6 miles at 17 percent. Wow.
Happy Feet = toe warmers in shoes + booties
"150 psi for others and even higher for tubulars (200++). I think this is the key performance diff, as the higher psi tires are clearly going to roll easier than a less hard tire surface."
Not unless the road is perfectly smooth.
http://sheldonbrown.com/tires.html#rolling
pretty heavy roster of u23s. we better hope the kiddies dont have any down weekends in between NRC races or the club races are gonna be harder to say the least. nice work, baz.(skntcycling.com)
happy, nice comments have no place on this website.
Triathletes:
-triple the athlete
-mediocre geeks on ostentateous bikes
-mankini
Power Meters:
post says " a good workout should leave the rider feeling about the same whether using a HR or Power tap, right? "
Well not really, that’s the difference between physical stress and mental stress.
Your heart rate can be elevated but your power reduced due to all sorts of factors. So that poses the question of is your training well targeted becuase your HR is in the right zone even though your power is lacking? If the winner of the race was the guy who had the highest or lowest HR at the end of the race this sort of training would be great, but this is a sport dicated by power ( not entirely but to a large extent ) so the guy who can hold the highest power for the longest time will usually win.
Training soley with HR you are subject to different factors which can be misleading, such as half life, cardiac drift, dehaydration, heat etc. but with power watts are watts. Having said all that a good coach can calculate all this in to a HR based training program.
Do you need a power meter to train? absolutley not. Is it a useful training metric? totally. Can it make your training more focussed and help you identify your weaknesses and work on them more efficiently? without doubt. Will it make you a better racer? sorry, there are no silver bullets.
From a purely analytical stand point training with power & heart rate is better than just training with HR, however if you don’t knonw how to use the numbers and convert those in to a training program that brings results a power meter is just a really expensive bike computer.
Tires:
Rolling resistance is not entirely defined by tire pressure. Max pressure for a lot of clincher manufactures is defined by the fact that they are clinchers and as wheel manufactures make lighter and lighter wheels the possibility of tire pressure collapsing the rim wall if quite high so that’s part of the equation.
Another part of the equation is the shape of the tire and how well it holds that shape, under difference directional forces. Tubs are made to be very round and do not deform as much under direction forces ( cornering, sprinting etc. ) Because of the way a clincher must grip the rim with it’s bead the shape cannot be as uniform as a tub and a lot of this is what dicates the ride quality.
The weight differnce is really not an issue. I’d rather have a tire that didn’t puncture and got me to the end of a race, than a light tire that helped bring my bike under the UCI weight limit.
good post.
OK, so all interesting and legit posts, but how do we define "better" for a tire then? Ive used 150 psi race tires to great effect, and recently have tried another manufacturer and noticed only after buying that they recommend only 120 psi. I bought it so decided to use it anyway… Assuming both will stay on the rim (neither has collapsed or anything…), and forgetting ride quality (we’re talking speed here…), is the higher psi tire better or not? Im tempted to think so, but since the 120 psi tire is from a big intnl maker that could certainly afford to design a higher psi product, I must be missing something key here. The harder tire does feel harder, and I assume must be giving better rolling resistence performance, no? What gives???
Also, do the pros all use tubulars still, or do they sometimes use clinchers? I sort of assume they use tubulars for the lower weight, higher psi and smoother ride – esp since they get a hired hand to mount and change them!
I’m curious about handling as well. A thin, light clincher at 150lbs doesn’t exactly inspire my confidence on high-speed descents, and entering turns really hot as in a crit. I have very little experience on tubulars. Is there a marked advantage in these situations?
quality tubulars have a much nicer feel when riding than clinchers. they are considered superior racing tires for a number of reasons but as for pure speed, they allow you to run greater pressure w/o sacrificing handling. Taking a high speed corner on a nice tubular at 140 psi is fairly safe and you feel more contact/grip with the road. taking the same corner on continental gp 4000 clincher at 140psi is a nice way to end up in the bushes
….don’t ride tubulars, don’t use a power meter.
I mean, don’t ride clinchers, don’t use a power meter.
Tires Part Deux
Tire pressure does have a lot to do with rolling resistance. But tires are design with an optimum pressure range ( depends on how much weight you’re putting on them and your riding style ) The pressure range dictates the shape of the tire which is one of the most important elements. A tire that retains it shape and keep maximum contact with the road surafce at all times will give good holding in corners and traction when you put the power down in both wet and dry conditions. So higher pressure is not always better as it could reduce the tire surface contact with the road therefore reducing your power transfer. Think about drag racing, massive horsepower, big fat low pressure tires, but they go really fast, really quickly.
Rubber compound will have some effect on the rolling resistance as well. An example is some tires made for the track use a softer compound to grip the boards better, the design is looking for a balance between traction & rolling resistance. The surface the tire is running on is quite smooth. Use that same tire on the road and you’ll find it’s handling completely different. I hope that answers your question?
Do all pro’s still use tubs? I know a few teams have been riding on clinchers but the majority of ProTour teams would still be on tubs. I know a couple of guys who ride pro and they are all on tubs. Hell if someone else is paying for them, gluing them and I have neutral service or a team car with spare wheels, I’m going with tubs everytime.
Solid additional points. Its true I’ve had issues at times with wheel skip when sprinting, and this is more pronounced on the high psi tires (though compounded by my body position too far forward). Not sure about the tradeoff though between the long dist on that tire vs the issue in the sprint – Id rather be confident that Im not hampered for the other 99% of the race by too much rolling resistence. Still, I see your point about the tradeoff of power transfer at least for the moments of high torque. Thanks for the elaboration…
As for the tire discussion, what we’re missing here is the makeup of the casing. A higher TPI (threads per inch) casing will be more supple and will ride more comfortably/maintain better road contact at higher pressure. Cheaper tires with stiffer casings will ride uncomfortably at higher pressure and lose contact with the road, creating greater rolling resistance. Tubulars tend to be quite supple which is why they have the rep for being so comfortable, handling so well, and can still have low rolling resistance at high pressure.
I’ve been using Vittoria’s and Veloflex’s, both high TPI casing clinchers, and love their comfort and road grip/handling.
Lastly, light weight clincher wheels tend to have psi limits. My American Classics have a 120 psi limit and my HEDS have a 130 psi limit.
Jay
The tire discussion is interesting, but at our level races are won on fitness, brains or guile. Tires don’t matter.
And tires probably don’t dictate results at higher levels, but I wouldn’t know.
I agree with adm. Rolling resistance is hardly worth worrying about. The most important issue with race tires is how well they grip in corners. If you’re putting 150 psi in your tires at a crit (no matter what the claimed max psi is), you’re not making yourself any faster. All you’re doing is increasing your odds of crashing and taking others down with you.
so basically, if you are a local racer not a pro, and you ride clinchers like 95% of us, you’re better off riding something which will give you adequate grip and no flats…right?
To jonathon – – generally yes. I’ve flatted out off a lot of races that i might have done well in. "Might" being the operative word. It’s very hard to catch back on if you flat. Last year I only saw two guys do it. Badger did it at Palmer in the 35+ (on the last lap) and ended up with a top 10, and some guy (whose name I forget) did it at Bear Mtn (Fall) in the Cat 3 field and ended up with a top 5. Both of those guys were very strong and the race played to their favor. But it’s generally very hard to do it. When you flat at our level, it’s usually time to go home. So much of cycling is based on luck, you may as well put the odds in your favor a bit by riding a tire that is flat-resistant.
adm don’t be so quick to dismiss an interesting thread at least talking about tires is somewhat contructive and informative for the readers. Unlike most of the stuff I’ve seen posted on this site about ‘my dick being bigger than your dick’
I guess sensible discussion is not good for your page view count when trying to attract advertisers?
Tire selection in mountain bike racing is highly strategic and can make a huge difference. Pressure, sticky v firm compound, knob height, tread pattern, and tire width. Add to that tube v tubeless. Off road, tubeless tires allow for much lower pressure and better traction without pinch flatting. I’ve read about tubeless road tires. Where is that technology now, and is there any advantage?
If you want to read about all the hardest of the hard core, from tire pressure to to knowing what a clincher rim looks like compaired to a tubular check out THIS:
http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?forum=1;guest=9983259
…Only then will you be able to know how to place in your AG, set a PR, bring home the hardware and get what you need from the LBS. Real Experts discussing the harsh realities of the Tri World.
The First, the Real, the only "Tri-Guy"
-TG
Interesting stuff, like this one
http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=1095120;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;guest=9983259
Coach L, maybe you could help Lisa Michele out?
I’ve caught back up after flats – never in a park race though. In road races with good neutral support.
Lurker – – Like I said, it’s an interesting discussion. My dismissiveness has nothing to do with the length of the discussion on this page. This is a subject people have discussed among themselves for ages. I personally think it’s hard to win a race if you’ve flatted on your ultra-light, ultra-fast, over-inflated tire.
To "someone you may know" – – didn’t mean to offend. I’m sure there are plenty of other guys (yourself included) who’ve caught back on, but I’ve been particularly unsuccessful at it. Good wheel support is key, as is being either (1) really fast (which I’m not) or (2) fortunate enough to flat at a slower or flatter part of the race (which I haven’t been). I now just try to avoid flats (nothing novel there) at the risk of being on a marginally slower tire.
Wow that was hardcore. I learned that I have inflate my tire!
I also learned what my clincher rim look like compared to a tubular.
To much for me, way to hardcore! This site sucks, only listen to tri guy.
Tri guy, tell me more!
Only time I’ve ever heard a pro blast a sponsor in an interview was when Van Petegem said that when he was on Mercury the bikes were awful and the tires they rode at Roubiax slipped all over the place and prevented them from being competitive. Feel free to investigate for yourself which bikes and tires he was talking about.
Stop pretending to be me – ‘Real’ Tri Guy etc…. Are you guys so lame you can’t even come up with your own identities? But maybe it’s too hard for you to THINK FOR YOURSELF after riding around in your little pack all day….
Listen up "Tri-Guy", I was there from the first mankini to the TT bikes at interbike. My Cervelo P3 is gold plated and worth over $30K, and I can average almost 19mph for at least 1hr. I set a PR last year at Mooseman. I also gave you pathetic cyclists the link to slowtwitch.com. Need I prove myself more????
-TG
ps: Look out 2007, I’ll be spending all winter doing one legged intervals on my computrainer. I’ll be over 19mph for sure.
Tri bikes on a Sunday in CP at 30 m.p.h. on the downhill at 72nd with shoppers and tourists and idiots wandering around are NOT smart entities.
Saw one nearly smash a poor overloaded shopper. Nasty.
Tri-Guy’s gotta train HARD!!! No time or space for tourists. My aerobars cut through tourists like a hot knife through butter…wait, 30mph??
That wasn’t a tri-guy, everyone knows we only go 19mph, max.
-TG